GDG- A little clarification please.
CWMHTours at aol.com
CWMHTours at aol.com
Fri Jan 27 09:03:44 CST 2012
Add to that that in just DC and Alexandria this was a huge supply base.
The whole area between the White House and Georgetown was full of
warehouses. The Navy Yard was full of supplies. The Washington Arsenal- Ft McNair
was full of supplies. The whole of Alexandria was a big quartermaster base
and all those supplies could be shipped to Grant overnight.
A Loyal Neo-Anti Unionist,
Peter
In a message dated 1/27/2012 9:54:47 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
dherko at kc.rr.com writes:
Esteemed GDG Member Contributes:
Lee could not have drawn the AoP away from their supply base by going
North.
The Union had developed a series of permanent and temporary supply depots.
I did quite a bit of study on City Point. Montgomery Meigs was the QM
General, Ingals was the AoP QM chief. As the AoP moved across Virginia
throughout the war, the War Department closed and opened temporary depots - city
point was the best example. Permanent depots were just informed by
telegraph or other means on how to push supplies and to where they would go.
The greatest example of Union Supply efficiency was the mail for Sherman's
Army. Sherman had not informed the war department on the exact timeand
place of where he would emerge at the end of his march. His troops received
the fisrt batch of mail within the week, I think actually four days but
less than seven is good enough for arguement's sake. The Union Supply system
was that good.
At Petersburg, if I was a regimental QM, I could request a set of shoes
size 16EE. The request would flow up the chain of command (QM side) through
the AoP to Ingals office, as the now Chief of QM for the Armies Operating
around Richmond (or whatever title he had). His department was operating
out of the Epp plantation house overlooking the City Point Warfs. If the
clothing warehouses did not have the set of shoes, the request was passed to
Meigs HQ in DC, where the request would be sent to the depot for clothing
(lets say Boston for instance) if Boston Depot did not have the 16EE, they
would contact the manufacturer and several sets of 16EE shoes were made, sent
to Boston, forward an intermediate depot if one was assigned for low
priority routine deliveries or possibly put on a ship right to City Point if the
request was given a higher priority. Remember City Point was, during the
seige, the busiest port in the world.
Conferderate Soldiers who for months smelled fresh bread being delivered
to Union troops at Petersburg were in awe when they were proceessed through
City Point as prisoners.
Again that is Lee not truly understanding what he was up against. His men
were supplying themselves for two years on Union good (sadlles, blankets,
weapons, clothing, wagons, cannon, anything they could pick up) the supply
never stopped. The wagon train that Stuart captured had 250 brand new
wagons with brand new bits, straps, harnesses, theat stuff was being crated
at record pace.
As Lee was running out of serviceable horses, Meade had more than he could
use. Hunt was able to create a secret wagon train filled with ammunition
for a big fight. The corperate Union Army, that was prosecuting the war
strategically was light years ahead of the CSA. Only Sherman's Army during
his Georgia was the only Union Army that ever was completely severed fro the
Union supply system.
VR
Don Herko (US Army Loggie)
--- Tom Barrett <tbarrett21 at cox.net> wrote:
> Esteemed GDG Member Contributes:
>
> From a military standpoint, I think he wanted to draw the AoP far enough
so
> that they were separated from their supply and support bases and far
enough
> that they would be tired, scattered, and not able to concentrate
> effectively. Drawing them toward Harrisburg was a good plan, but
spreading
> them out would have been even better, so the AoP Corps couldn't quickly
> support one another.
>
> I think he figured that his forces would be more rested and better
> concentrated than the AoP, and that he'd pick off and defeat the Union
units
> as they came north.
>
> As it turned out, Gettysburg wasn't far enough, and the AoP was well
> organized, well supplied, and was able to concentrate effectively. For
> whatever reason, Lee chose to attack anyway.
>
> Regards,
>
> TB
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> >
> >> Esteemed GDG Member Contributes:
> >> I tend to favor the notion that Harrisburg was a decoy to draw Union
> forces out into the open. I absolutely believe that Lee would have sent
> forces into the city, primarily to destroy railroad infrastructure,
damage
> manufacturing operations, capture supplies, and generally create
further
> panic in the north, but holding the city was never an option. I believe
> there was a relatively small window of opportunity for the ANV to
operate
> in Pennsylvania.
> >>
> >> On Jan 26, 2012, at 2:13 PM, keith mackenzie wrote:
> >>
> >>> Esteemed GDG Member Contributes:
> >>> I've read a couple of posts where the esteemed member insisted that
Lee
> did not intend to hold Harrisburg if he did in fact assault and take it.
> >>> I don't know if it was more than one poster or only one several
times.
> >>> My
> >>> question is, does anyone think he would have attempted to hold it? I
> don't think anyone has put forward that POV, but I might have missed it.
> >>> thanks
> >>> K.
> >>>
>
----------------http://www.arthes.com/mailman/listinfo/gettysburg_arthes.com
> -to unsubscribe
> http://arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg_arthes.com/ for Archives
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4768 - Release Date: 01/26/12
>
>
>
----------------http://www.arthes.com/mailman/listinfo/gettysburg_arthes.com -to unsubscribe
> http://arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg_arthes.com/ for Archives
----------------http://www.arthes.com/mailman/listinfo/gettysburg_arthes.com
-to unsubscribe
http://arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg_arthes.com/ for Archives
More information about the Gettysburg
mailing list