GDG- "Lee's Illness Lost Gettysburg"

Jack Lawrence jlawrence at kc.rr.com
Fri Jan 27 07:46:54 CST 2012


But defending Lee sells articles.

Publishers are business people too. So you get some weak stuff as the price 
for the good stuff.

Regards,

Jack
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bob Coffman" <bcoffman at ohio.net>
To: "GDG" <gettysburg at arthes.com>
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 7:40 AM
Subject: Re: GDG- "Lee's Illness Lost Gettysburg"


> Esteemed GDG Member Contributes:
>
>
>> The title was very unfortunate.  Overly sensational, like something you'd 
>> find on a supermarket tabloid.  Beneath Gettysburg Magazine's dignity, 
>> IMO.
>
> Jim,
>
> I haven't read the article but I had that impression from the title alone. 
> I appreciate the analysis of Lee's condition but the implication is 
> Healthy Lee = victory at Gettysburg, or wherever a healthy Lee would have 
> chosen to fight.  That is a massive leap.
>
> - Bob
>
> ----------------http://www.arthes.com/mailman/listinfo/gettysburg_arthes.com 
>  -to unsubscribe
> http://arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg_arthes.com/ for Archives
> 





More information about the Gettysburg mailing list