GDG- A little clarification please.
jlawrence at kc.rr.com
Thu Jan 26 15:10:55 CST 2012
Not that it makes a difference, but that is my take also.
----- Original Message -----
From: "William Baetz" <wbaetz at mac.com>
To: "GDG" <gettysburg at arthes.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 2:51 PM
Subject: Re: GDG- A little clarification please.
> Esteemed GDG Member Contributes:
> I tend to favor the notion that Harrisburg was a decoy to draw Union
> forces out into the open. I absolutely believe that Lee would have sent
> forces into the city, primarily to destroy railroad infrastructure,
> damage manufacturing operations, capture supplies, and generally create
> further panic in the north, but holding the city was never an option. I
> believe there was a relatively small window of opportunity for the ANV to
> operate in Pennsylvania.
> On Jan 26, 2012, at 2:13 PM, keith mackenzie wrote:
>> Esteemed GDG Member Contributes:
>> I've read a couple of posts where the esteemed member insisted that Lee
>> did not intend to hold Harrisburg if he did in fact assault and take it.
>> I don't know if it was more than one poster or only one several times.
>> question is, does anyone think he would have attempted to hold it? I
>> don't think anyone has put forward that POV, but I might have missed it.
>> -to unsubscribe
>> http://arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg_arthes.com/ for Archives
> -to unsubscribe
> http://arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg_arthes.com/ for Archives
More information about the Gettysburg