GDG- Inevitable defeat
Jeff Burk
jlb4tlb at yahoo.com
Tue Jan 24 12:42:22 CST 2012
Your point about the river being shallow is true today. However that is because the river has been dammed upstream. during the war the river flowed free.
Namaste
Jeff Burk
>________________________________
>From: "CWMHTours at aol.com" <CWMHTours at aol.com>
>To: gettysburg at arthes.com
>Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 1:14 PM
>Subject: Re: GDG- Inevitable defeat
>
>Esteemed GDG Member Contributes:
>The river at that point is frequently shallow in summer droughts but very
>wide and quite an obstacle. Very rocky.
>
>A smart and careful commander would not want to put more than an
>expeditionary force that could have been sacrificed on the east side of the river.
>Harrisburg was no significant military goal other than being a state
>capital and RR center.
>
>Thre are 2 57mm guns sitting on the west side of the river there.
>
>A Loyal Neo-Anti Unionist,
>Peter
>
>
>In a message dated 1/24/2012 2:22:49 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
>mdblough1 at comcast.net writes:
>
>Esteemed GDG Member Contributes:
>Tom-The militia destroyed it in order to keep the Confederates using it to
>cross over the the eastern shore of the Susquehanna. Harrisburg is on the
>east and this would have enabled the Confederates to attack the city from
>both sides. While Lee initially ordered the bridge's destruction, the ANV
>generals on the scene saw the advantages to saving it and tried to save it.
>The Susquehanna is not one of the wildest rivers in the world but bridges
>were needed to cross it and with that bridge out there wasn't another until
>Harrisburg. The hope was to destroy sections so it could be rebuilt later
>but, in the days before dynamite, that sort of precision wasn't easily
>obtained. The Columbia-Wrightsville bridge was a wood & stone covered bridge
>believed to be the longest such bridge in the world at the time and the flames
>that destroyed the wood, leaving only the granite supports.
>
>
>Regards,
>
>
>Margaret
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Tom" <bunco973 at optonline.net>
>To: "GDG" <gettysburg at arthes.com>
>Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 10:38:11 PM
>Subject: Re: GDG- Inevitable defeat
>
>Esteemed GDG Member Contributes:
>>>> And
>in fact, if you think about it, the damn thing IS still made of big
>granite blocks. Now just how are you going to knock the darn thing over
>without a
>whole lot of valuable time and trouble? <<< It was destroyed, by fire
>(not the granite supports of course), by Union militia.
>Regards, Tom B.
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: CWMHTours at aol.com
>Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 9:28 PM
>To: gettysburg at arthes.com
>Subject: Re: GDG- Inevitable defeat
>
>Esteemed GDG Member Contributes:
>Dave,
>
>Respectfully Sir,
>
>I think we disagree, sir.
>
>Where is it written that Lee disagreed with Jackson about destroying
>infrastructure in the North? I think Lee was just about as aggressive as
>Jackson was in bringing the war to your opponent. for example, Antietam,
>Gtysbg,
>& Monocacy.
>
>I am not dispersing you personally. I just see Lee & Jackson as being a
>balanced combination.
>
>By the time of 2nd Man Lee could see the Hammer and the Anvil.
>
>The Hammer was Jackson.
>
>The Anvil was the wonderful James Peter Longstreet, the Old Warhorse.
>
>Also, just curious, I don't recall reference to Lee being concerned about
>destroying the RR bridge over the Susq. R. being a big concern of his. And
>in fact, if you think about it, the damn thing IS still made of big
>granite blocks. Now just how are you going to knock the darn thing over
>without a
>whole lot of valuable time and trouble?
>
>Lee's 3 raids up north where just that. Raids. Move overwhelming forces
>up north and attack piecemeal in overwhelming force.
>
>The purpose of going north for Lee was to de-stabilizing the North.
>Everything else was a subset.
>
>A Loyal Neo-Anti Unionist,
>Peter
>
>
>
>
>
>----------------http://www.arthes.com/mailman/listinfo/gettysburg_arthes.com
> -to unsubscribe
>http://arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg_arthes.com/ for Archives
>----------------http://www.arthes.com/mailman/listinfo/gettysburg_arthes.com
> -to unsubscribe
>http://arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg_arthes.com/ for Archives
>
>
>----------------http://www.arthes.com/mailman/listinfo/gettysburg_arthes.com -to unsubscribe
>http://arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg_arthes.com/ for Archives
>
>
>
More information about the Gettysburg
mailing list