GDG- R v Wade - Hook

Dennis Lawrence denlaw at gojade.org
Sun Jan 22 10:13:32 CST 2012


At 09:54 AM 1/22/2012, you wrote:
>Esteemed GDG Member Contributes:
>And the Family Research Council would lose a huge "cash cow" if Roe 
>v. Wade was overturned. So what? Again, can we return to the summer 
>of 1863, please?
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>On Jan 22, 2012, at 10:49 AM, "Clarence Hollowell" 
><antietam33 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Esteemed GDG Member Contributes:
> >
> > Charles is 100 % correct, The NAACP wont deal with real issue 
> that has destroyed familiesbecause they know they cant change the 
> culture so they have to go after the white man 100 yrs ago.plus it 
> helps with the cash flow.............you may not like what I'm 
> saying but its the truth  Clarence Hollowell      > From: 
> CTJoyce at spearwilderman.com
> >> Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 10:43:38 -0500
> >> To: gettysburg at arthes.com
> >> Subject: Re: GDG- Shelby's Foote in His Mouth
> >>
> >> Esteemed GDG Member Contributes:
> >> With respect, it's not just "the NAACP" that finds itself 
> uncomfortable with Governmental sponsorship of the Confederate 
> Flag, i.e., the Navy Jack. Let's get back to the Gettysburg Campaign?
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPhone
> >>
> >> On Jan 22, 2012, at 10:38 AM, "CWMHTours at aol.com" 
> <CWMHTours at aol.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Esteemed GDG Member Contributes:
> >>> RE:  The Conf battle flag.
> >>>
> >>> The NAACP is insane and out of touch with  reality.
> >>>
> >>> Apparently their big bug is that the flag was used as a symbol  of white
> >>> supremacy - particularly by the Ku Klux Klan.
> >>>
> >>> But the Klan also used the Bible as the same symbol.   They 
> used the cross
> >>> for the same also.  They also used the American  flag.  They 
> also used bed
> >>> sheets.
> >>>
> >>> So why don't they regard the Bible the ssame way?
> >>>
> >>> Or the cross?
> >>>
> >>> Or the
> >>>
> >>> "Just  the facts, ma'am."
> >>>
> >>> Your Most Obediant Servant
> >>> Peter
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> In a message dated 1/22/2012 7:54:58 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> >>> pennmardel at mchsi.com writes:
> >>>
> >>> Esteemed  GDG Member Contributes:
> >>> <<So he thinks if African Americans read the  confederate 
> constitution they
> >>> wouldn't oppose display of the confederate  battle flag.  And 
> emancipation
> >>> of
> >>> the slaves was a sin.  The  slaves drifted into peonage with no 
> agency among
> >>> southern whites  whatsoever.  Really, Shelby?>>
> >>>
> >>> For what it is worth, I  attended a Lee-Jackson Day ceremony on Saturday
> >>> hosted by a local Sons of  Confederate Veterans Camp.  I have 
> gotten to know
> >>> the commander of the  Camp well, and he has participated with 
> me in a local
> >>> CW  presentation.
> >>>
> >>> This past July, this SCV Camp was invited to take part in  our 
> town July 4
> >>> parade.  The Camp agreed, but later withdrew when they  were 
> informed by the
> >>> parade officials that they could not display the  Confederate flag.
> >>>
> >>> On Saturday, I discussed this incident with the 
> Camp  commander, and asked
> >>> him whether he and other SCV Camps had considered  displaying the
> >>> Confederate
> >>> national flag, rather than the battleflag, at  public events -- 
> which would
> >>> be much less controversial.
> >>>
> >>> The  commander's response was immediate and adamant that he would not
> >>> compromise  his standards about displaying the battleflag in honor of the
> >>> heritage of  those who fought under its banner.  Once he got onto this
> >>> subject,  frankly it was difficult to divert him to something 
> more amenable
> >>> and less  controversial.
> >>>
> >>> It is difficult to find a reasonable solution or  compromise on 
> this issue.
> >>> Our CWRT displays both the American and  Confederate flags at 
> our meetings.
> >>> At a public ceremony in our town hall  last April in commemoration of the
> >>> beginning of the CW, both flags were on  display.
> >>>
> >>> However, officials remain reluctant to have the battleflag on  display in
> >>> outdoor events, for fear of a backlash.
> >>>
> >>> Not sure what the  answer to this problem is, but it certainly 
> does exist.
> >>>
> >>> Regards, Tom  Ryan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 
> ----------------http://www.arthes.com/mailman/listinfo/gettysburg_arthes.com
> >>> -to unsubscribe
> >>> http://arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg_arthes.com/ for  Archives
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 
> ----------------http://www.arthes.com/mailman/listinfo/gettysburg_arthes.com 
> -to unsubscribe
> >>> http://arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg_arthes.com/ for Archives
> >>
> >> 
> ----------------http://www.arthes.com/mailman/listinfo/gettysburg_arthes.com 
> -to unsubscribe
> >> http://arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg_arthes.com/ for Archives
> >
> > 
> ----------------http://www.arthes.com/mailman/listinfo/gettysburg_arthes.com 
> -to unsubscribe
> > http://arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg_arthes.com/ for Archives
>
>----------------http://www.arthes.com/mailman/listinfo/gettysburg_arthes.com 
>-to unsubscribe
>http://arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg_arthes.com/ for Archives





More information about the Gettysburg mailing list