GDG- Custer (and Gettysburg) On the Tube Again
jlawrence at kc.rr.com
Wed Jan 18 17:04:24 CST 2012
Because he didn't want them.
----- Original Message -----
From: <Batrinque at aol.com>
To: <gettysburg at arthes.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: GDG- Custer (and Gettysburg) On the Tube Again
> Esteemed GDG Member Contributes:
> In a message dated 1/18/2012 3:59:36 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> jlawrence at kc.rr.com writes:
> The problem with Custer is that, at Little Big horn he refused the use of
> 1) Buffalo Soldiers (could not fight, despite what he should have learned
> th ACW;
> What the heck are you talking about? There were no "colored" Army units
> available anywhere near the Little Big Horn. In 1876 there were none in
> Dakota or Montana and there was never any offer of any such unit to serve
> Custer in that campaign.
> 2) Gatling Guns (I thionk this decision to leave them behind reminds me
> The Gatling guns were drawn by condemned cavalry horses and had proven a
> major hindrance to mobility earlier during earlier phases of the campaign.
> And even if they had someone made it to the battlefield, the nature of the
> terrain is such that their utility would be problematical -- lots of hills
> and ridges and ravines and hidden ground.
> Bruce Trinque
> Amston, CT
> -to unsubscribe
> http://arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg_arthes.com/ for Archives
More information about the Gettysburg