GDG- Custer (and Gettysburg) On the Tube Again

[keith mackenzie]

I watched it too.  I was reminded that the only book I read about GAC was "Son Of the Morning Star".  then I wondered wether that book was still a viable source, since I think they made a movie out of it too. I'm not sure they really pushed custers actions as important to the winning, but more as an example of what a psychopath is capable of if you put him in exactly the right situation.
I probably don't mean that the way it sounds, but it's as close as I can come to what I do mean.
K.

"Hello! I'm The Doctor."
(Dr. Who)


________________________________
From: "Batrinque at aol.com" <Batrinque at aol.com>
To: gettysburg at arthes.com 
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 1:03 PM
Subject: GDG- Custer (and Gettysburg) On the Tube Again

Esteemed GDG Member Contributes:
Last evening I caught the new episode of PBS's "American Experience" titled 

Custer's Last Stand". It was fairly well done; i.e., neither engaged in  
mindless Custer-bashing nor was a worshipful paean to the man. It very  
much focused on Custer himself (and his wife) rather than on the battle of  
the 
Little Big Horn per se. There were a few minor errors and some  
interpretations I don't wholly agree with, but that is par for the course.  
One of the latter was the emphasis on how important Custer's actions were 
in  winning at Gettysburg.  The 
photography was much in the mode  popularized by Ken Burns's "The Civil 
War": lots 
of old photos, many of  which were not of the subject actually being 
discussed on screen, while the  camera zooms in or out or scans from side 
to side 
to provide a sense of  dynamism not present in a static photo. I find it 
interesting that in a  print work of history (a book) a wholly different 
standard of acceptable  practice applies -- in any reputable history book 
you 
would seldom find  photos of "not the real thing" used (unless carefully 
identified as such)  but on the TV screen that is normal practice (and in 
justification I suppose  you could say that necessity is behind it: you 
can't fill 
up two hours of  screen time with just images that were actually 
photographed 
at the  time).

Not the greatest thing I have ever seen on television, not the  worst. Not 
the best thing ever done on George Custer or his last battle, and  far from 
the worst. 

Bruce  Trinque
Amston, CT
----------------http://www.arthes.com/mailman/listinfo/gettysburg_arthes.com -to unsubscribe
http://arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg_arthes.com/ for Archives