GDG- Valley Forge at Gettysburg

[CWMHTours at aol.com]

You musta missed that he suggested that I was a  liar.
 
Did you see it?
 
Seems pretty crude and ignorant to me.
 
BTW-  I haven't seen you post to him about his suggesting  that I am a liar.
 
Don't you think you should based upon what you just posted to  me?
 
I kind of regard being called a liar as a personal attack,  which I'd like 
to think we all are above that level.
 
But just my opinion.
 
"Just  the facts, ma'am." Sgt. Joe Friday. Dragnet.

Your Most Obediant  Servant  

 
In a message dated 1/15/2012 7:47:15 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
lawrence at rwlcpa.com writes:

Esteemed  GDG Member Contributes:
Please talk about the issues, not each other We do  not accuse others of 
making ignorant comments. 


Sent from my  iPhone

On Jan 15, 2012, at 5:29 PM, "CWMHTours at aol.com"  <CWMHTours at aol.com> wrote:

> Esteemed GDG Member  Contributes:
> I am getting tired of dealing with your ignorant  comments  Al.
> 
> "Just  the facts, ma'am." Sgt. Joe  Friday. Dragnet.
> 
> Your Most Obediant  Servant   
> 
> 
> In a message dated 1/15/2012 12:44:45 P.M. Eastern  Standard Time,  
> atmackeyjr at aol.com writes:
> 
>  Esteemed  GDG Member Contributes:
> 
> 
> Esteemed GDG  Member Contributes:
> The  black and white line is crossed when  only one tree falls  in the 
> forest  
> nd is heard  and a lying author writes a book that says a dozen  trees  
all  
> ell at the same time.  And if you go back to the forest  and  see  only 
one 
> ree down doesn't that tell you that the  author is lying  and  the 
statement 
> s fiction and not  fact?
> ----------------
> How  do you know he's lying and  didn't simply make an honest mistake?
> 
> 
> nd   history is made up purely of facts.
> ------------------
>  Actually, history  is made up of facts and interpretations based on 
those  
> facts, because we  cannot have 100% of the facts of an  event.
> 
> 
> hen you deliberately, or  recklessly,  insert fictions into a  tellling 
of 
> istory that destroys   the integrity and it is no longer  history.
> 
> ind of like  saying  Lincoln and Grant had a meeting in the  Oval Office.
>  
> f you are  going to publicize a book for sale as "history"   then can't 
> ave  fiction in it- you have to call it  historical   fiction.
> -----------------
> What do you  make of the first edition of  David Martin's book on July 1, 
>  1863?
> 
> 
> oddington has minor errors and  since  publication new  facts have come 
out 
> o conflict with his   assertions.   But he  didn't put Grant and Lincoln 
in 
>  he  Oval Office.
> -------------------
> But did Grant and  Lincoln ever meet in  Lincoln's office?  If so, then 
the 
>  office is merely misnamed.
> 
> 
> Just  the facts,  ma'am.
> 
> Sgt. Joe Friday.  Dragnet.
>  -----------
> Joe Friday never said that.  So then does that   make you "a lying 
author?"
> 
> Best Regards,
> Al   Mackey
> 
>  
----------------http://www.arthes.com/mailman/listinfo/gettysburg_arthes.com
>   -to unsubscribe
> http://arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg_arthes.com/  for  Archives
> 
> 
>  
----------------http://www.arthes.com/mailman/listinfo/gettysburg_arthes.com  -to unsubscribe
> http://arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg_arthes.com/ for  Archives
>  
----------------http://www.arthes.com/mailman/listinfo/gettysburg_arthes.com
  -to unsubscribe
http://arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg_arthes.com/ for  Archives