GDG- Killing Lincoln

[Jack Lawrence]

Hello.

Withoiut trying to offend, that is silly.

History is what happened.

Not what it is used for a fourth tier book.

BTW: I am with only one eye.

Which means I look intently with the eye I have.

Regards,

Jack


 ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeff Burk" <jlb4tlb at yahoo.com>
To: "GDG" <gettysburg at arthes.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2012 7:43 PM
Subject: Re: GDG- Killing Lincoln


Esteemed GDG Member Contributes:
you are just to blind to see. If it is marketed as history it is history, 
good, bad or indifferent.

Namaste

Jeff Burk


>________________________________
> From: Jack Lawrence <jlawrence at kc.rr.com>
>To: GDG <gettysburg at arthes.com>
>Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2012 8:25 PM
>Subject: Re: GDG- Killing Lincoln
>
>Esteemed GDG Member Contributes:
>Greetings.
>KU kas prevailed, the team of Hank Stram has fallen to the legacy team of 
>Joe Montana and my homestead has been nourished, while we await the 
>performance of the St. Tebow his Rocky Mountain amateur hour, a few 
>comments.
>
>The cut and paste extract from the publisher is from the marketing side of 
>the house.
>So thar is all a null.
>The publisher, on the publishing side of the house, had not listed this 
>work as a history work.
>In its own house.
>No one has refuted this simple statement.
>So, if the publishing side does not count this as a "history" publication, 
>all academic arguments are void.
>Indeed, every time the word "history" in reviews is sued, it is with a 
>qualifier.
>
>Frankly, any book that has Lincoln furrowing his brow, wanting to vomit and 
>having nightmares belongs elsewhwere.
>
>Ford's Theater peddles this thing upstairs to make a few bucks. In the 
>history section, it is not available.
>
>This is not a history book. Some may peddle it with the word history, but 
>the publisher does not.
>
>No one has refuted thsi simple statemenr.
>
>Regards,
>
>Jack
>
>Perception is reality
>
>
>
>> Esteemed GDG Member Contributes:
>>
>>> We can discuss terms, but Holt, the publisher, does not list this as a 
>>> history book on its site. Maybe I am looking for it wrong. The terms 
>>> used aere samples of descriptions used for the book, including the 
>>> publishers site.
>>
>> Yes. You are wrong. It is not a novel and the publisher - and everyone 
>> else - describes it as a history.
>>
>> Here is how the publisher describes it.
>>
>> A riveting historical narrative of the heart-stopping events surrounding 
>> the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, and the first work of history from 
>> mega-bestselling author Bill O'Reilly
>>
>> What part of history don't you understand?
>>
>>
>> Take Care
>>
>> Dennis
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------http://www.arthes.com/mailman/listinfo/gettysburg_arthes.com 
>>  -to unsubscribe
>> http://arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg_arthes.com/ for Archives
>>
>
>
>
>----------------http://www.arthes.com/mailman/listinfo/gettysburg_arthes.com 
> -to unsubscribe
>http://arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg_arthes.com/ for Archives
>
>
>
----------------http://www.arthes.com/mailman/listinfo/gettysburg_arthes.com 
 -to unsubscribe
http://arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg_arthes.com/ for Archives