GDG- Polically Correct
tbarrett21 at cox.net
Wed Jan 4 13:02:38 CST 2012
I've tried to stay out of this discussion.
I could take either side...both sides have merit.
But you make a good point there. The political correctness you are
referring to is not unlike Affirmative Action...technically a fine concept,
except that in practice it often goes wrong and results in unintended
"The Battle" has many back stories, one of which is slavery. As long as the
back stories are kept in proportion to their relevance to the primary
subject, I'm happy. (The Battle really wasn't fought to drive off the
hunters of escaped slaves - but the very existence of slavery was certainly
one of the root causes of the conflict which led to The Battle.)
Same goes for Arlington. Keep things in proportion. People visiting the
gravesites of their WW II family members aren't there to hear about the
history of slavery on the land - but giving some background on the history
of the land shouldn't be a problem - in the right proportion to the subject
From: gettysburg-bounces at arthes.com [mailto:gettysburg-bounces at arthes.com]
On Behalf Of CWMHTours at aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 12:33 PM
To: gettysburg at arthes.com
Subject: GDG- Polically Correct
Esteemed GDG Member Contributes:
Apparently I am being criticized for using the phrase "politically
It is a phrase that I don't like and about never use.
I think it is appropriate in this case when a bureaucratically entrenched
program of omitting important information from the public in favor of other
less important information is actively pursued.
The people in here are usually pretty smart and astute.
Is anyone in here understanding my point?
I am not rascist. I don't believe in it.
I think there is a policy of reverse rascism in the NPS to the exclusion
of other minorities and races.
I have seen it. I worked for them. I know.
Your Most Obedient Servant,
http://arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg_arthes.com/ for Archives
More information about the Gettysburg