GDG- NPS & slavery
CWMHTours at aol.com
CWMHTours at aol.com
Mon Jan 2 17:41:35 CST 2012
My issue is simple- you have some 250,000-300,000 people buried in Arl
Some of them did things far more important worth mentioning that aren't
where as some slavery related issues are, "over emphasized".
In 20 years I've never met or heard of anyone going to Arl Cem to learn
It has it's place. But not beyond the proportion to the population.
G. Washington owned most of Arlington Cnty and much of the rest of No. VA
I wudda liked to have heard him talked about him a lot more and his
grandson who built the mansion.
That's all. In analogy to the Gtysbg V.C. I think it is exaggerated far
beyond it's importance and relevence.
Your Most Obedient Servant,
In a message dated 1/2/2012 6:32:43 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
jlawrence at kc.rr.com writes:
Esteemed GDG Member Contributes:
You know, when there are slave quarters behind the Lee mansion in Arligton
and the two slain Kennedy brotheres (both strong civil rights advocates)
buried there, I do not see your issue.
My favorite historical site at Arlington is in the back. The Confederate
memorial (the one that the SCV claims shows armed slaves fighting for the
south but really does not) is in the back with the Confederate graves.
outside the gravel maintenance parking lot. And behind the USCT burial
Seems kind of appropriate.
----- Original Message -----
From: <CWMHTours at aol.com>
To: <gettysburg at arthes.com>
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2012 4:45 PM
Subject: GDG- NPS & slavery
> Esteemed GDG Member Contributes:
> RE: The emphasize on slavery and emancipation at battlefields sites it
> not just the battlefields.
> In 1992 I began as a tourguide working as a narrator on the Tourmobile
> Trams in Wash, DC. There was, to me anyway, a rather bizarre
> over-emphasis on
> slavery on the tours.
> In particular Arlington Cemetery demanded that in our "script" that we
> make "X" number of references to slavery and African-Americans.
> Tourmobile was a contracted service vendor to the NPS which dictated the
> content of T's tours.
> I really have no objection at all to making such references. But
> currently Afro-African Americans are 10%-15% of the population and they
> appropriate attention.
> But if you ask me I think the proportion was way out of whack when it
> to the issue.
> And most citizens know almost nothing of the history of the cemetery
> the plantation.
> I am convinced IMO that there was less emphasis on George Washington,
> example, and his descendents there that there should have been while
> and African-Americans were over-emphasized.
> There were plenty of other things there that could have been mentioned.
> Had not slavery and A-A's been emphasized I think all things considered
> more important stuff was omitted while we talked about slavery and
> Take the issue of race out of it and they were topics far less important
> than other things.
> I can't imagine how many people visit Arl Cem for a dose of slave
> but it must be practically none.
> Where the motivation for this emphasis comes from I don't know. But
> again I have learned to be no admirer of the NPS.
> I have never been in the VC at Gtysbg. I have heard about the emphasis
> slavery in there and have avoided the place.
> Who in their right mind comes to Gettysburg to learn about slavery?
> Your Most Obedient Servant,
> -to unsubscribe
> http://arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg_arthes.com/ for Archives
http://arthes.com/pipermail/gettysburg_arthes.com/ for Archives
More information about the Gettysburg